Simulation study demonstrates a 100 Gb/s hybrid underwater-fiber-atmospheric optical link, indicating reliable high-speed data transmission across harsh maritime environments.
In this work, a hybrid optical communication link is presented that seamlessly integrates underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC), fiber, and free-space optics (FSO) to support high-speed underwater sensing. Ten underwater sensors form a \(10× 10\) Gb/s underwater wireless sensor network (UWSN) for continuous data collection. Communication is established through line-of-sight (LOS) UWOC and FSO channels, interconnected via a 1 km single-mode fiber (SMF) between an underwater drone (UD) and a surface ship. The UD employs a detect-remodulate-forward (DRF) relay to process received signals under varying water conditions, followed by wavelength translation from 532–539.2 nm into the O-band (1300–1307.2 nm), S-band (1470–1477.2 nm), and C-band (1550–1557.2 nm). At the ship, amplification is provided using rare-earth-doped optical fiber amplifiers (REDOFAs), including erbium-doped fiber amplifier (EDFA), thulium-doped fiber amplifier (TDFA), praseodymium-doped fiber amplifier (PDFA) and their hybrid combinations. Performance is evaluated in terms of bit error rate (BER) and quality factor (Q-Factor) across underwater environments (pure sea, clear ocean, coastal ocean, harbor-I, harbor-II), atmospheric attenuation (light haze: 2 dB/km, dense fog: 12 dB/km, heavy rain: 22 dB/km), and turbulence regimes ( \({C_n}^2=5× 10⁻¹⁶\) to \(5× 10⁻¹⁴\) m \(-2/3\) ). Results show that turbidity reduces the UWOC transmission distance from 29 m in pure sea to 4.1 m in harbor-II, while maintaining BER below \(9× 10⁻⁹\) and Q-Factor above 5.63. Atmospheric effects degrade the FSO transmission range; however, shipboard amplification compensates impairments and extends the overall achievable range of the hybrid system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: