summary Total and basal respiration (RtandRb, respectively) of intact and undisturbed roots of one‐year‐old Douglas fir seedlings,Pseudotsuga menziesiivar.glauca[Beissn] Franco, were measured at experimentally varied soil carbon dioxide concentrations ([CO2]). Use of specially designed root boxes and a CO2gas‐flow compensating system designed around an infrared gas analyzer (IRGA) allowed controlled delivery of CO2to roots and simultaneous measurements of CO2released by roots. Root respiration rate responded to each inlet [CO2], independent of whether the previous concentration had been higher or lower, within two to three hours (pairedttest = 0.041,P= 0.622, andn= 13). Total and basal respiration rates decreased exponentially as soil [CO2] rose from 130 ppm, well below atmospheric [CO2], to 7015 ppm, a concentration not uncommon in field soils. Analyses of variance (ANOVA) showed that the effects of soil [CO2] on rates of total and basal root respiration were statistically significant. Root respiration rates decreased by 4 to 5 nmol CO2g−1dry weight of roots s−1for every doubling of [CO2] according to the following equations: ln(R1) (nmol CO2g−1s−1) = 5.24–0.30*ln[CO2] withr= 0.78,P< 0.0001, andn= 70; and ln(Rb) (nmol CO2g−1s−1) = 6.29–0.52 * ln[CO2] withr= 0.82,P< 0.0001, andn= 35. The sensitivity of root respiration to [CO2] suggests that some previous laboratory measurements of root respiration at atmospheric [CO2], which is 3 to 10‐fold lower than [CO2] in field soils, overestimated root respiration in the field. Further, the potential importance of soil [CO2] indicates that it should be accounted for in models of below‐ground carbon budgets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
QI et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: