Key result
A multilevel solver combining eikonal and monodomain models was significantly faster than a single level solver for estimating myocardial scars from endocardial mapping data.
Why the study?
Estimating conductivity-related scar parameters from endocardial mapping requires computationally expensive monodomain simulations, which the authors sought to accelerate by combining models of different complexity.
Does a multilevel solver combining monodomain and eikonal models improve the efficiency of myocardial scar identification from endocardial mapping data compared to a single level solver?
Does a multilevel solver combining monodomain and eikonal models improve the efficiency of myocardial scar identification from endocardial mapping data compared to a single level solver?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Combining eikonal and monodomain models in a multilevel solver significantly accelerates the computational estimation of myocardial scars from endocardial mapping data.
AIMS: Detection and quantification of myocardial scars are helpful for diagnosis of heart diseases and for personalized simulation models. Scar tissue is generally characterized by a different conduction of excitation. We aim at estimating conductivity-related parameters from endocardial mapping data. Solving this inverse problem requires computationally expensive monodomain simulations on fine discretizations. We aim at accelerating the estimation by combining electrophysiology models of different complexity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Distributed parameter estimation is performed by minimizing the misfit between simulated and measured electrical activity on the endocardial surface, subject to the monodomain model and regularization. We formulate this optimization problem, including the modelling of scar tissue and different regularizations, and design an efficient solver. We consider grid hierarchies and monodomain-eikonal model hierarchies in a recursive multilevel trust-region method. With numerical examples, efficiency and estimation quality, depending on the data, are investigated. The multilevel solver is significantly faster than a comparable single level solver. Endocardial mapping data of realistic density appears to be sufficient to provide quantitatively reasonable estimates of location, size, and shape of scars close to the endocardial surface. CONCLUSION: In several situations, scar reconstruction based on eikonal and monodomain models differ significantly, suggesting the use of the more involved monodomain model for this purpose. Eikonal models can accelerate the computations considerably, enabling the use of complex electrophysiology models for estimating myocardial scars from endocardial mapping data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chegini et al. (2020) studied Myocardial scars. Multilevel solver combining monodomain and eikonal electrophysiology models vs. Single level solver was evaluated on Efficiency and estimation quality of scar location, size, and shape. A multilevel solver combining eikonal and monodomain models was significantly faster than a single level solver for estimating myocardial scars from endocardial mapping data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: