Key result
Swapping SH3 domains between paralogous yeast myosins Myo3 and Myo5 revealed that differences in protein-protein interactions depend on the host protein context rather than the SH3 domains themselves.
Why the study?
The evolution of the binding specificity of SH3 domains is not completely understood, particularly following gene duplication.
The study demonstrates that SH3 domains and their host proteins create essential intramolecular or allosteric interactions, making domains not functionally equivalent even with the same binding specificity.
Suggests targeting isolated protein domains may be insufficient for drug development; extends basic science understanding.
Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) drive many cellular processes. Some PPIs are directed by Src homology 3 (SH3) domains that bind proline-rich motifs on other proteins. The evolution of the binding specificity of SH3 domains is not completely understood, particularly following gene duplication. Paralogous genes accumulate mutations that can modify protein functions and, for SH3 domains, their binding preferences. Here, we examined how the binding of the SH3 domains of two paralogous yeast type I myosins, Myo3 and Myo5, evolved following duplication. We found that the paralogs have subtly different SH3-dependent interaction profiles. However, by swapping SH3 domains between the paralogs and by characterizing the SH3 domains freed from their protein context, we find that very few of the differences in interactions, if any, depend on the SH3 domains themselves. We used ancestral sequence reconstruction to resurrect the pre-duplication SH3 domains and examined, moving back in time, how the binding preference changed. Although the closest ancestor of the two domains had a very similar binding preference as the extant ones, older ancestral domains displayed a gradual loss of interaction with the modern interaction partners when inserted in the extant paralogs. Molecular docking and experimental characterization of the free ancestral domains showed that their affinity with the proline motifs is likely not the cause for this loss of binding. Taken together, our results suggest that the SH3 and its host protein could create intramolecular or allosteric interactions essential for the SH3-dependent PPIs, making domains not functionally equivalent even when they have the same binding specificity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lemieux et al. (2023) studied this question. SH3 domain swapping and ancestral sequence reconstruction vs. Extant wild-type SH3 domains was evaluated on Protein-protein interaction (PPI) profiles measured by DHFR PCA. Swapping SH3 domains between paralogous yeast myosins Myo3 and Myo5 revealed that differences in protein-protein interactions depend on the host protein context rather than the SH3 domains themselves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: