Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We show that any concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for a nontrivial language (i.e., for a language outside BPP), whose security is proven via black-box simulation, must use at least Ω(log n) rounds of interaction. This result achieves a substantial improvement over previous lower bounds and is the first bound to rule out the possibility of constant-round concurrent zero-knowledge when proven via black-box simulation. Furthermore, the bound is polynomially related to the number of rounds in the best known concurrent zero-knowledge protocol for languages in NP (which is established via black-box simulation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Canetti et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: