Key result
Blended collaborative care significantly improved the treatment response rate for health-related quality of life at 12 months compared to usual care (19% vs. 10%) in distressed CHD patients.
Why the study?
Psychological distress affects 15-40% of CHD patients and is associated with poorer prognosis, but the efficacy of blended collaborative care in this population required investigation.
Does a blended collaborative care intervention improve health-related quality of life in distressed patients with chronic coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=457)
randomized
Yes
Does a blended collaborative care intervention improve health-related quality of life in distressed patients with chronic coronary heart disease?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A telephone-delivered blended collaborative care intervention significantly improved health-related quality of life and psychological distress in patients with chronic coronary heart disease compared to usual care.
Introduction: Coronary heart disease (CHD) has serious implications for patients' quality of life (QoL). Psychological distress affects 15-40% of patients with CHD and is robustly associated with poorer prognosis. Blended collaborative care (BCC), a telephone-delivered intervention involving non-physician care managers that addresses both psychological and medical factors, can be applied for secondary prevention of CHD. METHODS: We conducted the multicenter, randomized controlled TEACH trial that investigated the efficacy of a BCC intervention (TeamCare) in distressed CHD patients. The primary aim was to examine the treatment response rate of TeamCare, defined as ≥50% improvements in health-related QoL (HRQoL, assessed by HeartQoL) after 12 months compared to usual care (UC). Secondary endpoints were changes in HRQoL, psychological and medical factors, and satisfaction with care. RESULTS: In total, 457 patients (mean age 62.9 ± 9.5 years, 23% females) were randomized to TeamCare (n = 230) or UC (n = 227). At 12 months, TeamCare patients showed a significantly higher proportion of treatment response to HeartQoL compared to UC (19% vs. 10%, respectively). TeamCare yielded significantly greater improvements in HeartQoL scores: global (d = 0.338), physical (d = 0.270), and emotional (d = 0.382). Further, TeamCare led to a significantly greater decrease in depression (d = -0.329), anxiety (d = -0.300), perceived stress (d = -0.233), and medical risk score (d = -0.235). Finally, BCC patients showed a higher satisfaction with overall treatment and psychosocial care. CONCLUSION: The TEACH study is the first ever performed BCC trial in distressed CHD patients in Europe. The BCC intervention has the potential to significantly improve secondary prevention in distressed CHD patients. .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadlonova et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in chronic coronary heart disease with psychological distress (n=457). Blended collaborative care (TeamCare) vs. Usual care (UC) was evaluated on Treatment response rate, defined as ≥50% improvements in health-related QoL (HeartQoL) after 12 months. Blended collaborative care significantly improved the treatment response rate for health-related quality of life at 12 months compared to usual care (19% vs. 10%) in distressed CHD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: