Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a paper recently published by the writer, on the single-line spectrum of magnesium, experiments were described in which it was found that when magnesium vapour in a vacuum was bombarded by electrons it was possible if the electrons possessed the requiste amount of kinetic energy to cause the vapour to emit a radiation consisting of the single spectral line λ = 2852.22 Å. U. At the time these experiments were made and the paper was written it was not known by the author whether this line was the first member of the series whose frequencies are given by ν = (1.5, S) - (m, p2), or of the series whose frequencies are represented by ν = (1.5, S) - (m, P). Since the single line spectra of mercury, zinc and cadmium consisted of the single spectral line whose frequency is given by ν = (1.5, S) - (2, p2), it was assumed that the line λ = 2852.22 Å. U. also had a frequency represented by this formula. On the basis of this assumption it was deduced from well-known data regarding the magnesium series spectra that the wave-length of the line whose frequency is ν = (1.5, S) - (2, P) should be approximately λ = 2073.36 Å. U. As in some experiments made by the writer, in collaboration with Mr. Evan Edwards, it had been shown that the absorption spectra of the vapours of mercury, zinc, and cadmium consisted of bands at lines whose frequencies were given by ν = (1.5, S) - (2, p2), and ν = (1.5, S) - (2, P), it was expected that the absorption spectrum of magnesium vapour would also exhibit bands at λ = 2852.22 Å. U. and λ = 2073.36 Å. U.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John Cunningham McLennan (1916) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: