Facial displays can be ambiguous indicators of internal affect, but physiological-proxy-gated fusion has rarely been evaluated with transparent failure analysis. SilentDepress AI is examined here as an affect-fusion prototype rather than a clinical depression detector. We audited a local corpus of 30 video sequences from five participants, covering six nominal affective categories, and ran a publicly versioned seven-output facial classifier on every decoded frame. Mean frame logits produced a sequence-level accuracy of 20.0% (participant-block 95% CI 16.7–26.7%); the corresponding six-category restricted accuracy was 26.7%. We then performed 1000 paired constructed Monte Carlo cohorts per prespecified scenario using empirical visual Dirichlet priors and label-conditioned heuristic physiological proxies. In the primary sensitivity scenario, the highest mean constructed-case accuracy was 44.6% for 40/60 fusion. An independent external WESAD analysis using nested subject-level LOSO yielded 87.22% balanced accuracy (95% CI 77.22–95.56%) and 88.00% accuracy for native baseline-versus-stress discrimination. This external physiological evaluation was not synchronized with the local facial-video corpus and was not used as a seven-class fusion input. The simulation therefore evaluates the numerical behavior of the gating rule only and exposes the evidence still required for clinical evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bastidas-Benalcazar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: