Aficamten for Symptomatic Nonobstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
View Full Paper
Presenting authorAhmad MasriHeart Failure & Transplant · Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USAAhmad Masri is an Associate Professor of Medicine in the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine at Oregon Health & Science University. He serves as the director of the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Center and specializes in caring for patients with cardiomyopathies, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, amyloidosis, and Fabry’s disease. His research overlaps with his clinical focus on diagnostic approaches and therapeutics in cardiac conditions.
Provides first targeted option for symptomatic nonobstructive HCM; extends myosin inhibition beyond obstructive disease.
Key result
Aficamten significantly improved the KCCQ clinical summary score (mean difference 3.0; 95% CI 0.5-5.5) and peak oxygen uptake (mean difference 0.67; 95% CI 0.22-1.11) vs placebo at 36 weeks.
ACACIA-HCM has reported — post the first read.
ACACIA-HCM is the first Phase 3 trial to show statistically significant improvements in both symptom burden (KCCQ-CSS) and exercise capacity (pVO2) with aficamten versus placebo in patients with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a population with no approved disease-modifying therapies. The trial met both dual primary endpoints at 36 weeks, with consistent positive findings across secondary endpoints including NYHA class and NT-proBNP. There is meaningful context given the failure of mavacamten (ODYSSEY-HCM) in this same population. Safety concerns around LVEF reduction (10% with aficamten vs 1% placebo) and the modest magnitude of KCCQ improvement (3-point delta) have drawn attention, though full data presentation is still pending.
RCT (n=517)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does aficamten improve peak oxygen uptake and patient-reported health status in adults with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
In patients with symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aficamten significantly improved exercise capacity and patient-reported health status at 36 weeks, though with an increased risk of reversible LVEF reduction.
Mean Difference: 3 (95% CI 0.5–5.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 11.4% vs 8.4%
p-value: p=0.02
Masri et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Symptomatic nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=517). Aficamten vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change from baseline to week 36 in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS) (MD 3.0, 95% CI 0.5 to 5.5, p=0.02). Aficamten significantly improved the KCCQ clinical summary score (mean difference 3.0; 95% CI 0.5-5.5) and peak oxygen uptake (mean difference 0.67; 95% CI 0.22-1.11) vs placebo at 36 weeks.