BACKGROUND: A prospective two-yr study was undertaken to assess the heterogeneity of thyroid nodules using the fine-needle aspiration (FNA) technique of systematic regional sampling. In addition, we determined the number of regions to be sampled to minimize non-diagnostic results, and to optimally characterize thyroid nodules. DESIGN: FNA was performed on 74 nodules > or = 1.5 cm. in diameter in five distinct regions in sequence (center, then four quadrants starting at 12:00, clockwise). Slides from each region were coded, randomized, subjected to blind review, and categorized as non-diagnostic (ND), benign (B), indeterminate (ID), suspicious/neoplastic (S/N), or malignant (M). Final cytologic diagnosis (CD) was made from all slides of each nodule. RESULTS: The ND rate for center FNAs alone was 16%, but addition of the 12:00 region decreased it to 5.3%. With 3, 4, or 5 sequential sites the nondiagnostic rates were 4, 2.6, and 2.6%. The center region diagnosis was identical to the final CD in 71% of the cases. Addition of the 12:00 region increased the concordance to 88%. Three sequential regions equaled the CD in 93% of cases, and 4 regions equaled the CD in 99% of cases. All nodules characterized as M or S/N were resected as were 76% of the ID nodules. Of the 43 nodules characterized as B, 3 were resected, 24 involuted, 6 were unchanged, and 10 were lost to follow-up. All 3 M nodules proved malignant by histology, as did 7/10 S/N, 0/17 ID, and 0/43 B nodules; 3/10 S/N, 1/17 ID and 1/43 B were adenomas. Likelihood ratios for diagnosing neoplasia were ND:0, B:0.10, ID:0.21, S/N:infinity, M:infinity. CONCLUSIONS: Sampling of at least four distinct regions accurately assesses thyroid nodules while minimizing ND results. Regional sampling also addresses intranodular heterogeneity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Musgrave et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: