Why the study?
Does vesnarinone suppress gene expression induced by aortic regurgitation in cardiac fibroblasts?
Does vesnarinone suppress gene expression induced by aortic regurgitation in cardiac fibroblasts?
Vesnarinone suppresses the expression of noncollagen extracellular matrix proteins in cardiac fibroblasts from hearts with aortic regurgitation, suggesting a potential mechanism for mitigating cardiac fibrosis.
Should not change AR practice; hypothesis-generating for antifibrotic effects in cardiac fibroblasts.
Pathologic fibrosis precedes heart failure (CHF) and death in experimental aortic regurgitation (AR). Vesnarinone, a positively inotropic quinolone derivative, suppresses survival of fibroblasts (CF) from hearts with chronic experimental AR. To explore further the potential effects of vesnarinone on cardiac fibrosis in AR, we tested the hypothesis that vesnarinone suppresses gene expression induced by AR in CF. Differentially expressed genes were isolated by suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) in CF from hearts of 2 New Zealand White rabbits with surgically induced AR compared with 2 normal rabbits. In cultured AR-CF treated with and without vesnarinone (4 doses, including the dose that had caused maximal survival suppression in cultured AR-CF), drug effect was assessed on expression of genes found to be up-regulated by AR. SSH, reverse Northern analysis, and Northern analysis indicated that at doses several orders of magnitude lower than those used for treatment in CHF vesnarinone significantly down-regulated 2 genes (thrombospondin 1, annexin II) up-regulated by AR. The study confirmed earlier findings of AR-mediated alteration in expression of genes that code for noncollagen extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. Thus, in CF conditioned by exposure to AR, vesnarinone at relatively low doses suppresses genes coding for 2 noncollagen ECM proteins up-regulated by AR. These pharmacologic effects may underlie potentially therapeutic mitigation of fibrosis by vesnarinone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truter et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: