Why the study?
Does d,l-sotalol alter cardiac repolarization differently in a canine model of dilated cardiomyopathy compared to controls?
Does d,l-sotalol alter cardiac repolarization differently in a canine model of dilated cardiomyopathy compared to controls?
In a canine model of heart failure, d,l-sotalol causes exaggerated prolongation of cardiac repolarization, highlighting the impact of ventricular electrical remodeling on drug effects.
May heighten torsades risk with sotalol in CHF; hypothesis-generating for repolarization remodeling effects in humans.
Despite the presence of well-described cardiac repolarization abnormalities in heart failure, d,l-sotalol effects on cardiac repolarization have not been evaluated in animal models of CHF. The authors hypothesized that the d,l-sotalol effects on cardiac repolarization are altered in canine dilated cardiomyopathy when compared to controls. Effects of d,l-sotalol were compared in seven dogs with tachycardia induced cardiomyopathy (CHF) and six control animals. In an open-chest model, contact monophasic action potential recordings were obtained from RV and LV endocardium/epicardium during and after two doses of d,l-sotalol (1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg, each over 20 minutes). Effects of d,l-sotalol on action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) were examined at pacing cycle lengths of 300-1,000 ms. Plasma d,l-sotalol levels were measured at baseline, 10, and 40 minutes following each dose. Prolongation of APD90 by d,l-sotalol, was significantly exaggerated in CHF animals versus controls (P < 0.05, ANOVA). These differences were magnified at slow heart rates (P < 0.05, ANOVA). There were no significant differences in plasma d,l-sotalol levels between the two groups. Effects of d,l-sotalol on cardiac repolarization are exaggerated in CHF without significant alterations in plasma drug levels. While using d,l-sotalol in heart failure, independent additional effects due to ventricular electrical remodeling may be a consideration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chugh et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: