Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Discrete choice experiment reveals limited impact of an agglomeration bonus on restoration participation among German farmers, suggesting voluntary schemes require regulatory backstops.
This paper investigates how the design of an agglomeration bonus influences farmers’ participation in a stylised peatland restoration scheme. Results from a discrete choice experiment with 110 farmers in Germany indicate that the bonus has only limited influence compared to land-use restrictions. In the mixed logit and latent class estimations the bonus is statistically insignificant and mostly ignored in the decision-making process. Only when preferences are adjusted for attribute non-attendance does the bonus enhance willingness to participate and the scheme’s cost-effectiveness. Overall, voluntary schemes appear insufficient for ambitious peatland restoration goals, suggesting a need to complement incentives with regulatory measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langanke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: