Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates peak bio-oil yields at 500–600 °C during solar pyrolysis of demolition wood, highlighting pathways for carbon-neutral aviation fuel production.
Aviation remains a critical climate challenge in Europe, with emissions stubbornly high due to fossil fuel dependence, rising demand, and the slow adoption of low-carbon alternatives. SAFs, currently under 1% of fuel use, face barriers like high costs and limited feedstocks. The EU's Fit for 55 package mandates SAF blending targets of 2% by 2025, scaling to 70% by 2050, including e-fuels. To address these challenges, CNRS-PROMES (France) developed a solar-assisted quartz hybrid drop-tube/fixed-bed reactor (DTR), optimized for low-temperature pyrolysis (500 - 700 °C) and bio-oil production from the pyrolysis of demolition wood. The aim was to evaluate and optimize bio-oil yields, analyze products distribution (bio-oil, char, and gases) and elemental composition, and identify potential improvements to the solar reactor. The results showed that the bio-oil yield peaked at 500 °C, reaching 56 wt% when accounting for the “mass lost” required to close the mass balance, assuming that the missing mass consisted exclusively of liquid products. When considering only the measured mass, the bio-oil yield peaked at 600 °C, at 50 wt%. It declined at higher temperatures due to secondary cracking, while gas yield increased (12.5 - 20.4 wt%) and char yield remained stable (∼32 wt%) before slightly dropping at 700 °C. Compared to a Bubbling Fluidized Bed (BFB) reactor, the DTR produced less bio-oil (43 wt% for DTR vs. 62 wt% for BFB) and less gas (12 wt% for DTR vs. 17 wt% for BFB), but more char (32 wt% for DTR vs. 15 wt% for BFB), highlighting trade-offs tied to heat transfer and residence time. The study concludes that moderate temperatures (500 - 600 °C) favor bio-oil and char, while higher temperatures promote gasification, demonstrating the potential of solar-driven pyrolysis for scalable, carbon-neutral SAF production and circular biomass valorization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SUBRAMANI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: