Comparative modeling study reveals exposure-aware routing significantly decreases pollutant exposure during school commutes, suggesting localized benefits across urban environments.
Air pollution is a major environmental risk factor, particularly for children, who experience repeated exposure during daily school commuting. Exposure-aware routing has been proposed as a strategy to reduce contact with environmental pollutants; however, limited evidence exists regarding how optimization opportunities vary across pollutants and urban environments. This study presents a GeoAI-based framework for pollutant-aware route optimization using OpenStreetMap street networks and air quality data from the Basque Government environmental monitoring network. Approximately 2000 simulated school commuting trajectories were generated across Donostia-San Sebastián and Bilbao’s metropolitan area. For each origin–destination pair, the shortest-path route was compared with alternative routes optimized for PM10 and NOx exposure. The results revealed substantial differences between pollutants and cities. In Donostia-San Sebastián, NOx optimization produced the greatest benefits, with more than 10% of routes achieving exposure reductions above 5% and a maximum reduction of 54.9%. In contrast, Bilbao exhibited the highest optimization potential for PM10, with a maximum reduction of 32.8% and 8.2% of routes achieving reductions greater than 5%. Meaningful reductions were generally achieved with moderate increases in traveled distance. These findings suggest that exposure-aware routing may benefit a subset of school commuting trajectories and that optimization potential strongly depends on the local environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerexeta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: