Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Historical analysis reveals how resource-attracting versus resource-embedding policies drive spatial inequality, indicating critical trade-offs between economic output and local resilience.
We built a theory on how entrepreneurial ecosystem policy benefits some places within rural regions while leaving others behind. In a historical analysis of the Scottish Highlands and Islands, 1965 to 1990, we compared policies that attract external resources from outside the region with those that embed resources within local communities. We found that resource-attracting policies not only generated higher economic output but also concentrated opportunity, drained peripheral areas, and increased regional fragility. Resource-embedding policies produced lower aggregate output but greater spatial inclusion and resilience. Our historical analysis identifies spatial draining, disempowerment, and empowerment as mechanisms through which policy shapes ecosystem outcomes over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: