Experimental and numerical study demonstrates enhanced particulate sampling efficiency using pressure gauge ports at high velocity ratios, indicating a safe alternative for pipeline monitoring.
Addressing the safety limitations and operational challenges associated with online particulate matter sampling in high-pressure natural gas pipelines, this paper proposes and systematically investigates a non-intrusive, safe sampling alternative utilizing existing pressure gauge tapping ports. Through experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) numerical analyses, the influence of velocity ratio R (ratio of sampling velocity to pipeline gas velocity), pipeline flow velocity V0, and port orientation on sampling efficiency η (ratio of sampled concentration to true concentration) was examined. Results show that sampling via a pressure gauge port exhibits a trend contrary to traditional isokinetic sampling: efficiency increases significantly with R. At R = 2, particles below 10 μm are effectively collected, with notably improved capture for larger particles. Flow field analysis reveals that efficiency enhancement originates from a recirculation zone upstream, expansion of the high-pressure zone downstream, and a “wall impaction–bounce–recapture” mechanism under high R conditions. An empirical efficiency formula was established based on experimental data, with prediction errors below 15%. In field tests at a gas transmission station, applying this correction increased the evaluated filtration efficiency from 9.4% to 50.2%, effectively restoring true operating conditions. This study provides a reliable theoretical basis and practical technical solution for safe, convenient, and accurate particulate monitoring in natural gas pipelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: