Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking study demonstrates automated AUTOSAR BSW configuration via fine-tuned LLMs and compact JSON representations, indicating an 8.4-fold accuracy gain over zero-shot baselines.
The configuration of AUTOSAR Basic Software (BSW) modules relies on verbose AUTOSAR XML (ARXML) files that are complex, error-prone, and costly to produce manually—particularly for safety-critical modules governed by ISO 26262. This paper presents a two-stage approach to automating BSW configuration generation that generalizes to any ECU Configuration (ECUC)-based module: a fine-tuned large language model (LLM) generates a compact JSON intermediate representation capturing only semantically meaningful parameters, which a deterministic expansion function reconstructs into schema-conformant ARXML. We fine-tune three open-weight models (Qwen3-8B, Ministral-3-8B-Instruct, Llama 3.1 8B) with Quantized Low-Rank Adaptation (QLoRA) on 6050 compositionally generated Watchdog Manager (WdgM) samples spanning five complexity tiers with 30+ prompt templates, and introduce a hierarchical evaluation pipeline combining schema validation with referential integrity, structural completeness, parameter accuracy, and semantic constraint satisfaction. The compact representation reduces output tokens by approximately 8–10× compared to full ARXML. All three models achieve closely comparable performance (0.815–0.836 overall score), with Llama 3.1 8B scoring highest (0.836) and every model reaching ≥93% schema validity and ≥72% parameter accuracy—an 8.4× improvement over zero-shot baselines. Decomposing generation into LLM-driven semantic capture and deterministic expansion is an effective strategy for verbose, schema-governed configuration formats, extensible to other AUTOSAR modules beyond WdgM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samy et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: