Validation study reveals a 7.5 cut-off score on the 5-item hearing scale detects impairment in older adults, indicating its utility for rapid screening when audiometry is unavailable.
This study aims to validate the Chinese 5-item version of the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (C-SSQ5), and to investigate the ideal cut-off value, sensitivity, and specificity of the C-SSQ5 in older adults with hearing impairment (HI). The C-SSQ5 was administered to measure self-perceived hearing ability for 114 older adults (60 ~ 88) with HI and 50 older adults (60 ~ 85) with normal hearing (NH). The optimal cut-off value for the C-SSQ5 as a hearing screening tool was calculated by comparing different cut-offs and hearing thresholds. Overall, the C-SSQ5 demonstrated good reliability, internal consistency, and high sensitivity to the older adults with HI. The C-SSQ5 scores were negatively correlated with better-ear ( r = -0.704, p < 0.001) and worse-ear (r = -0.634, p < 0.001) pure-tone average (PTA) among older adults. When better-ear PTA ≥ 35dB HL was taken as a screening criterion, the optimal cut-off score of the C-SSQ5 was 7.5, with a sensitivity of 74.4%, a specificity of 87.8%, a positive predictive value of 73.9%, and a negative predictive value of 88.2%. The C‑SSQ5 is a reliable screening tool suitable for the rapid assessment of older adults who cannot undergo conventional behavioral audiometry. As such, it holds promise as a potentially important clinical instrument for the early detection, referral, and management of hearing loss.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: