Historical case study demonstrates how social infrastructure enables grassroots counterpublics to drive change via social friction, highlighting a radical pluralist model of urban life.
Social infrastructure has often been discussed as a means to reduce social tension, build community and facilitate the forming of social capital. However, social infrastructure can also foster positive social change in a quite different way. Through supporting grassroots self-organized counterpublics, it can produce positive social change via creating broader social friction. This alternative vision of social change fits within a more radical model of urban life in which groups sit inherently in tension with one another, rather than a model stemming from a liberal tradition focused on consensus or mutual understanding. In Belfast in Northern Ireland during the early 1970s, inner-city working-class communities resisted unwanted urban redevelopment during a time of broader social unrest. Social infrastructure became a base for communities to self-organize, as well as a target for destruction by government actors due to its ability to sustain sometimes-violent civic action. This article draws on this historical case to re-embed social infrastructure within a pluralist model of society. This case shows the potential of social infrastructure to support positive social change not just by creating social harmony within a liberal paradigm of consensus, but by enabling grassroots community counterpublics to create social friction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sean French (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: