PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 27, 2026Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery

Cost Effectiveness of Prophylactic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension During Hysterectomy

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AMAshley MurilloMSMonica SaleebJSJonathan P. Shepherd

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Economic model demonstrates prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension during benign hysterectomy is cost-effective with modest risk reduction, supporting selective surgical adoption.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the costs and cost-effectiveness of routinely adding prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension to benign hysterectomies to prevent pelvic organ prolapse.
  • A decision-tree cost-effectiveness model (TreeAge Pro, 2024 U.S. dollars) integrated Medicare Physician Fee Schedules and Diagnosis-Related Group data.
  • Assigned a health utility of 0.864 for prolapse following hysterectomy with a mean onset of 7 years, applying a 3% discount rate across sensitivity analyses (0–20 years).
  • Calculated the minimum relative reduction in prolapse risk required for prophylactic suspension to achieve cost-effectiveness at a $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) threshold.
  • Prophylactic uterosacral ligament suspension added $4,992.87 in procedural costs.
  • The procedure achieved cost-effectiveness at the $100,000/QALY threshold when relative prolapse risk decreased by ≥7.1%, meeting cost-effectiveness criteria in 87.0% of modeled scenarios.
  • The minimum preventive benefit needed ranged from a 5.8% risk reduction for immediate prolapse onset to 10.5% for onset delayed by 20 years.

Cite This Study

Murillo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a8fea0110c91c1e92621f63https://doi.org/10.1097/spv.0000000000001916
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share