Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Computational evaluation reveals prompt length and token position drive routing entropy in mixture-of-experts models, indicating aggregate entropy reflects sequence mechanics rather than task...
Sequence Position Explains an Apparent Complexity Gradient in Mixture-of-Experts Routing Entropy. Preprint, version 1.1 (August 2026; version 1.0 June 2026). Not peer reviewed. Routing entropy, the Shannon entropy of the distribution a mixture-of-experts (MoE) router places over its experts at a token, is often averaged over a prompt and read as a measure of how hard the model is working. We show that this average inherits a positional effect that can masquerade as a complexity effect. On a 168-prompt suite graded into twelve levels of intended cognitive complexity, all-token mean routing entropy rises with level in two MoE models (DeepSeek V3.1, Spearman ρ=+0.80; Qwen3.5-397B, ρ=+0.62; n=168 each) and tracks prompt token count more tightly still (ρ=+0.88 and +0.78). Per-token routing entropy rises with position inside the prefill in every prompt of a per-token diagnostic, so longer prompts, which the grading also makes longer, pool more high-entropy positions and lift the mean. A readout at the final prefill token, a single position whose causal context is the whole prompt, removes the gradient (ρ=+0.02, p=0.82, and ρ=-0.06, p=0.42) and reverses the extremes: the short level-1 prompts show slightly higher final-token entropy than the long level-12 prompts in both models (p<0.001). The all-token pattern replicates on DeepSeek R1. In this setting the aggregate gradient is a function of token count and token position, so a between-prompt difference in averaged routing entropy is interpretable as a difference in what the prompts demand only when position or length is controlled; a position-controlled readout is the minimal control. Changes in this version. Single-thesis revision (August 2026): one claim carried abstract to conclusion, position diagnostic and final-token readout foregrounded, proposed-experiment lists removed, terms defined at first use. All version 1.0 numeric values retained. This deposit contains the paper (LaTeX source and built PDF), a claim-by-claim source index (SOURCES.md), and the supporting data directory, unchanged from version 1.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeffrey W. Shorthill (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: