Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study reveals PRV UL40 disrupts Akt-EphA2 binding to trigger inflammation in mouse models, highlighting a target for alphaherpesvirus disease.
Herpesvirus infection triggers excessive inflammation, contributing to tissue injury and disease severity, but the underlying drivers remain unclear. Here we identify EphA2 as a critical mediator of pseudorabies virus (PRV)-induced inflammatory response. Genetic or pharmacological inhibition of EphA2 reduced TNF-α production in PRV-infected cells and mice, alleviated liver and lung damage, and improved mice survival. Mechanistically, PRV infection promoted EphA2 phosphorylation at Ser-897, which activated NF-κB and MAPK pathways to drive TNF-α production. The PRV tegument protein UL40 directly bound the EphA2 kinase domain (residues 697–901), a region that also interacts with Akt. Unexpectedly, Akt acted as a negative regulator of inflammation, as its knockdown exacerbated cytokine production. UL40 competitively disrupted the constitutive EphA2–Akt complex in a time-dependent manner, relieving Akt-mediated restraint on EphA2 S897 phosphorylation. Accordingly, a UL40-deficient PRV mutant failed to enhance S897 phosphorylation, elicited lower inflammatory responses, and showed attenuated virulence in mice. Collectively, our findings reveal a proviral strategy whereby PRV UL40 hijacks EphA2 to counteract an intrinsic Akt-dependent inhibitory pathway. This UL40–EphA2–Akt cascade is a critical determinant of virus-induced inflammation, and EphA2 S897 represents a potential therapeutic target for mitigating alphaherpesvirus immunopathology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: