Fault detection and identification of gas turbines is a crucial process for providing engine safe operation and decreasing the maintenance costs. In studies conducted in the field of global optimization-based gas turbine fault diagnosis, the genetic algorithm as the most well-known evolutionary optimization algorithm is usually employed to identify the engine health parameters. However, because of the evolutionary and stochastic nature of this algorithm, the genetic-algorithm-based diagnosis usually suffers from computational burden and reliability. To mitigate this problem, in the present work, a comparative study has been performed on the global optimization-based gas turbine fault diagnosis, and it is shown that an innovative hybrid optimization algorithm as a fault detection and identification system can significantly enhance the performance of the conventional optimization-based diagnosis systems, even in the presence of measurement noise. The results obtained indicate that the fault detection and identification system based on the hybrid invasive weed optimization/particle swarm optimization algorithm outperforms all the examined diagnosis systems (i.e., the genetic-algorithm-based, particle-swarm-optimization-based, and invasive weed-optimization-based fault detection and identification system) in terms of accuracy, reliability, and especially computational cost. The results demonstrate that the genetic-algorithm-based fault detection and identification system showed the weakest performance among all the examined diagnosis systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammadi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: