No AccessJournal of UrologyClinical Urology: Original Article1 Apr 1996Questionnaire-Based Outcomes Study of Nononcological Post-Vasectomy Complications J.M. Choe and A.K. Kirkemo J.M. ChoeJ.M. Choe and A.K. KirkemoA.K. Kirkemo View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66244-XAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: We conducted an outcomes analysis to determine the incidence of post-vasectomy complications. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire (154 questions) addressing post-vasectomy complications, incidence of post-vasectomy scrotal pain and quality of life issues was sent to 470 patients. Followup telephone surveys were made. Results: A total of 182 patients (42.3 percent) responded. Mean followup was 4.8 years. The most common complication was post-vasectomy scrotal pain in 34 men (18.7 percent), which adversely affected quality of life in 4 (2.2 percent). In retrospect, 71.4 percent of the men were satisfied with the decision for vasectomy, 19.3 percent had equivocal feelings and 9.3 percent were dissatisfied. Conclusions: Chronic scrotal pain is the most common post-vasectomy complication that may adversely affect quality of life in men undergoing vasectomy. References 1 : Vasectomy: what are community standards?. Urology1986; 27: 328. Google Scholar 2 : Medicolegal aspects of urology. Urol. Clin. N. Amer.1980; 7: 153. Google Scholar 3 : Complications of 2,711 vasectomies. J. Urol.1974; 111: 365. Link, Google Scholar 4 : One thousand vasectomies. Brit. Med. J.1973; 4: 216. Google Scholar 5 : Morbidity associated with vasectomy. J. Urol.1973; 110: 413. Link, Google Scholar 6 : The bipolar needle for vasectomy. 1. Experience with the first 1000 cases. Fertil. Steril.1979; 29: 676. Google Scholar 7 : Open-ended vasectomy, sperm granuloma, and post-vasectomy orchalgia. Fertil. Steril.1979; 32: 546. Google Scholar 8 : Vasectomy and health: results from a large cohort study. J.A.M.A.1984; 252: 1023. Google Scholar 9 : A late post-vasectomy syndrome. J. Urol.1985; 134: 494. Link, Google Scholar 10 : Spermatic granuloma: an often painful lesion. Fertil. Steril.1978; 31: 178. Google Scholar 11 : Chronic testicular pain following vasectomy. Brit. J. Urol.1992; 69: 188. Google Scholar 12 : Quantitative pathologic changes in the human testis after vasectomy. A controlled study. New Engl. J. Med.1985; 313: 1252. Google Scholar 13 : Changes in the epididymis after vasectomy: sonographic findings. AJR1988; 152: 531. Google Scholar 14 : Microscopic vasectomy reversal. Fertil. Steril.1977; 28: 1191. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 15 : A comparison of open-end versus closed-end vasectomies: a report on 6220 cases. Contraception1992; 46: 521. Google Scholar 16 : Vasal sterilization in China. Contraception1993; 48: 255. Google Scholar 17 : The no-scalpel vasectomy. J. Urol.1991; 145: 341. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Vas deferens occlusion during no-scalpel vasectomy. J. Fam. Pract.1994; 39: 577. Google Scholar Department of Urology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan© 1996 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byParekattil S, Gudeloglu A, Brahmbhatt J, Priola K, Vieweg J and Allan R (2013) Trifecta Nerve Complex: Potential Anatomical Basis for Microsurgical Denervation of the Spermatic Cord for Chronic OrchialgiaJournal of Urology, VOL. 190, NO. 1, (265-270), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2013.LEVINE L and MATKOV T (2018) MICROSURGICAL DENERVATION OF THE SPERMATIC CORD AS PRIMARY SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CHRONIC ORCHIALGIAJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 6 Part 1, (1927-1929), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001.NANGIA A, MYLES J and THOMAS A (2018) VASECTOMY REVERSAL FOR THE POST-VASECTOMY PAIN SYNDROME: : A CLINICAL AND HISTOLOGICAL EVALUATIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 6, (1939-1942), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2000. Volume 155Issue 4April 1996Page: 1284-1286 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1996 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information J.M. Choe More articles by this author A.K. Kirkemo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
CHOE et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: