This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
When providing support for people with intellectual or developmental disabilities (IDD), it is important that evidence-based strategies are utilised in an ethical manner with the wellbeing of the individuals supported at the centre of all decision-making. Proponents of Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) and Positive Behaviour Support (PBS) have been known to engage in discussions that can be polarising, and the overlap between the two disciplines is not always clear. The current paper reviews the literature around the sometimes-strained relationship between PBS and ABA over the past 40 years, with a view to understanding the current position and discourse. Arising from this, we outline ways in which this current position may result in negative outcomes for the people supported, individuals in need of support and their families. The aim of this paper is to create a starting point to discuss how we can work together to create better outcomes for all.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández-Mateos et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: