Key result
Computational models of diverse executive function profiles successfully simulated perseverative errors on the WCST for individuals with schizophrenia, relatives, and controls.
Why the study?
No consensus exists regarding the contribution of executive function to dysfunctions in schizophrenia, prompting examination of whether cognitive task performance is multiply realised by uneven executive function profiles rather than a single component deficit.
Computational modeling supports the multidimensional hypothesis of executive function in schizophrenia, suggesting that diverse EF profiles rather than a single deficit account for performance on the WCST.
Extends computational modeling of executive deficits in schizophrenia; hypothesis-generating with no immediate clinical implications.
Deficits in executive functions (EF) are frequently implicated in the aetiology of schizophrenia. However, no consensus exists regarding the contribution of EF to the dysfunctions observed in these individuals, with competing accounts arguing a primary role for deficits in inhibition, shifting and updating. We examine an alternative proposal referred to as the multidimensional hypothesis – rather than performance on cognitive tasks being primarily dependent on a single EF, the performance is multiply realised by a range of uneven EF profiles. We describe a computational approach, using the WCST, that allows manipulations to ability levels of processes relating to each EF component to be explicitly assessed. Our central objective is to determine whether models exhibiting unique profiles of EF abilities may simulate the performance of three target groups: individuals with schizophrenia, healthy first–degree relatives, and controls. For each target group, we show that of the performance measures yielded by the WCST, perseverative errors (PE; commonly assumed to rely heavily on EF) are simulated by multiple models. For a range of secondary measures (cards sorted, categories completed and non-perseverative errors; assumed less specific to EF abilities) our manipulations show little resemblance to the target groups. We view these results to support the multidimensional hypothesis, in that (1) no single EF process accounts for the poorer performance of the schizophrenic group, and (2) performance of PE in the target groups is achieved in models of diverse EF profiles. The implications of these findings for the study of EF in neuropsychological disorders are discussed
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haywood et al. (2020) studied Schizophrenia. Computational modeling of executive function profiles was evaluated on Simulation of perseverative errors on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. Computational models of diverse executive function profiles successfully simulated perseverative errors on the WCST for individuals with schizophrenia, relatives, and controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: