This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Under technically relevant air-fed polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) operation, the low-frequency impedance response is shaped by overlapping oxygen-transport processes along the cathode channel and through the porous gas diffusion layer (GDL), microporous layer (MPL), and cathode catalyst layer (CCL). Local ionomer hydration and liquid-water accumulation further modify these transport processes. In this study, these low-frequency contributions are resolved locally using an along-the-channel segmented PEMFC by combining sequential segment-wise electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with subsequent distribution of relaxation times (DRT) analysis. Targeted variations in inert gas, cathode stoichiometry, current density, and relative humidity were evaluated together with along-the-channel current-density distributions, allowing two distinct low-frequency processes, P LF1 and P LF2 , to be separated over the investigated operating window. The results show that the relaxation frequency of the lower low-frequency peak, P LF1 , depends primarily on channel-gas velocity. Its polarization contribution is additionally influenced by oxygen depletion and oxygen transport along the channel. The higher low-frequency peak, P LF2 , is governed mainly by local through-plane oxygen transport through the GDL, MPL, and CCL and responds strongly to the effective oxygen diffusion coefficient, local oxygen availability, local current density, and water-modified transport conditions in the porous cathode. These findings establish a mechanistic distinction between a predominantly channel-related low-frequency contribution and a predominantly local through-plane oxygen-transport contribution in the porous cathode, providing a physically informed basis for interpreting low-frequency impedance signatures under technically relevant PEMFC operating conditions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oppek et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: