Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
High-power electric aircraft motors and generators require high current density conductors to meet the required performance metrics, which are beyond those achievable using ambient temperature metals.MgB₂superconductors and high-purity aluminum (HPAL) hyperconductors are being considered for this work because of their combination of high current density/ampacity in combination with relatively low AC loss and their ability to work at the temperature of liquid hydrogen and above. In this work, we calculated the AC losses ofMgB₂and HPAL conductors of various wire architectures in applied magnetic fields of 0.5 T and frequencies,f, up to 1 kHz. In particular, we estimated the contributions of several AC loss components, including eddy current and coupling losses, in AC magnetic fields and frequencies relevant to AC motors and generators in electric aircraft. The losses were then summed up and presented in terms of power loss per length, per unit current [W/(m*A)] in order to fairly compare the AC losses of superconductors to hyperconductors over various frequency regimes. Additionally, we accounted for the anomalous magnetoresistance component of the HPAL conductor, using data from a newly developed composite, measured at 20 K in fields up to 9 T in a PPMS. We conclude that for a 0.5 T, externally applied, time varying field,MgB₂is the lowest loss conductor forff> 180 Hz (explored up to 1 kHz), based on our chosen conductor design assumptions. However, the best place to transition fromMgB₂to HPAL composites lies somewhere in the 200 Hz to 1 kHz regime, depending on the parameters of the conductors, the value ofBₘ, and the relative tradeoffs inJₑand power loss per unit volume the application demands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: