Why the study?
Does the location of prior myocardial infarction (inferior vs. anterior) differentially affect left ventricular and left atrial remodeling?
Does the location of prior myocardial infarction (inferior vs. anterior) differentially affect left ventricular and left atrial remodeling?
Inferior myocardial infarction is associated with less left ventricular remodeling but greater left atrial remodeling compared to anterior MI, largely driven by a higher incidence of ischemic mitral regurgitation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inferior MI was associated with greater LA dilatation and ischemic MR despite less LV remodeling; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Background. Left ventricular (LV) remodeling is greater in patients with anterior myocardial infarction (MI) compared to those with inferior MI. Left atrial (LA) remodeling is expected to have influences from both LV remodeling and mitral valve dysfunction or mitral regurgitation (MR), which is more frequent in inferior MI. Therefore, LA remodeling may not necessarily be less in inferior MI compared to anterior MI. The purpose of the study is comparison of LV and LA remodeling in patients with anteroseptal and inferior MI with or without MR.Methods. In 61 consecutive patients with prior anterior MI, 33 with prior inferior MI, and 22 normal control subjects, LV and LA volumes were measured using biplane Simpson's method, and MR fraction was quantified by Doppler echocardiography.Results. Although patients with inferior MI had significantly less LV dilatation (LV end-diastolic volume: 91±11 vs. 125±45 vs. 106±19 ml, control vs. anterior vs. inferior, p<0.01) and reduction in LV ejection fraction (63±6 vs. 44±7 vs. 49±8 %, p<0.01), their LA dilatation was significantly greater compared to those with anterior MI (51±12 vs. 64±28 vs. 78±31 ml, p<0.01). Incidence of ischemic MR (fraction>20%) was significantly higher in patients with inferior MI compared to anterior MI (7/61 vs. 12/33, p<0.01). In selected patients without significant ischemic MR, LA dilatation was comparable between inferior and anterior MI (60±28 vs. 61±16 ml, n.s.).Conclusions. Compared to patients with anterior MI, LV remodeling is significantly less but LA remodeling is significantly greater in inferior MI, suggesting the important role of ischemic MR to induce LA remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arikawa et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: