Key result
Neostigmine significantly increased diaphragm excursion after extubation compared to normal saline (14.14 vs. 12.96 mm, P<0.05) in patients undergoing neurosurgery.
Why the study?
Neuromuscular monitoring cannot be performed on conscious patients, but diaphragm ultrasonography may detect residual neuromuscular blockade after general anesthesia.
Does neostigmine improve diaphragm excursion and reduce postoperative pulmonary complications compared to normal saline in patients recovering from cis-atracurium neuromuscular block?
RCT (n=150)
Double-blind
Variable block randomization 1:1
No
Does neostigmine improve diaphragm excursion and reduce postoperative pulmonary complications compared to normal saline in patients recovering from cis-atracurium neuromuscular block?
While neostigmine reversal of neuromuscular blockade improves early diaphragm excursion compared to normal saline, it may paradoxically increase the risk of early postoperative respiratory insufficiency.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support neostigmine to enhance post-extubation diaphragm excursion in neurosurgery; hypothesis-generating for clinical outcomes.
Background Residual neuromuscular blockade (RNMB) is a well-known risk factor after general anesthesia for critical respiratory events and higher postoperative morbidity. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors cannot completely avoid RNMB. Neuromuscular monitoring of the adductor pollicis is the gold standard for detecting RNMB, but it cannot be carried out on conscious patients. Ultrasonography of diaphragm excursion may reveal residual effects of neuromuscular blocking agents in conscious patients. Methods This prospective, double-blind, single-center randomized controlled study enrolled 150 patients, who belong to ASA physical status I and II, aged 18–65 years, and be scheduled to undergo neuromuscular block with cis-atracurium for neurosurgery. The primary objective will be to compare the difference in DE between groups. Patients will be extubated when the train-of-four ratio is ≥ 0.9. Diaphragm ultrasonography will be used to evaluate the diaphragm excursion. The Diaphragm ultrasonography will be performed before anesthesia induction, at one minute after extubation, and before being discharged from the PACU. The secondary objective was to compare the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications after operation. Results After extubation, the DE of patients was significantly larger in the NEO group than in the NS group (14.14 ± 1.93 vs. 12.96 ± 1.62 mm, P < 0.05). The incidence of RNMB was higher in the NS group, when compared to the NEO group, after extubation (73.33% vs. 53.33%, P = 0.011) and when leaving the PACU (33.33% vs. 20%, P = 0.044). The incidence of respiratory insufficiency after extubation was higher in the NEO group (14.67%), when compared to the NS group (4%) (P = 0.046). Conclusion Residual neuromuscular blockade is still a problem to be solved. Diaphragm ultrasound may become a bedside tool in the neuromuscular monitoring field to detect underestimated residual neuromuscular blockade after neuromuscular block. Trial registration: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at ClinicalTrials.gov (ChiCTR1900021095, Date of registration: January 28, 2019).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Residual neuromuscular blockade after general anesthesia (n=150). Neostigmine vs. Normal saline (10 ml) was evaluated on Diaphragm excursion (DE) at one minute after extubation (p=<0.05). Neostigmine significantly increased diaphragm excursion after extubation compared to normal saline (14.14 vs. 12.96 mm, P<0.05) in patients undergoing neurosurgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: