Key result
In a nationwide survey of Chinese anesthesiologists, only 10.2% reported routinely using neuromuscular function monitors, and 71.11% relied solely on clinical manifestations to evaluate recovery.
Why the study?
Little was known about the recent use of neuromuscular blocking agents and monitoring in China.
Cross-Sectional (n=637)
The frequency of using neuromuscular function monitors and reversal agents remains extremely low among anesthesiologists in China, highlighting a potential safety issue regarding post-operative residual curarization.
Reliance on clinical signs may risk incomplete neuromuscular recovery; leaves open whether education or policy boosts objective monitor adoption.
Background Little is known about the recent use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) and monitoring in China. This paper presents the results of a nationwide survey conducted to obtain information regarding the current management of NMBAs in China. Methods A questionnaire was sent to Chinese anesthesiologists inviting them to participate in the study. The questionnaire was available through the wenjuanxing website, and the link was sent to 1,488 anesthesiologists using the Wechat mini app. Results The web-based survey consisted of 28 questions, and data were collected using an online tool. Between May 19, 2021 and June 16, 2021, 637 responses were collected (response rate = 42.8%). Only 10.2% of anesthesiologists reported using neuromuscular function monitors, and 6.59% of respondents reported that they had the relevant monitors in the operating room. Conclusion Although PORC is a potential safety issue, the frequency of using reversal agents and monitors remains extremely low in China. Surveys such as this are important to understand the use and application customs of NMBAs in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Anesthesia management practices (n=637). Neuromuscular blocking agents and monitoring practices was evaluated on Routine use of neuromuscular function monitors. In a nationwide survey of Chinese anesthesiologists, only 10.2% reported routinely using neuromuscular function monitors, and 71.11% relied solely on clinical manifestations to evaluate recovery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: