Minus-strand DNA transfer, an essential step in retroviral reverse transcription, is mediated by the two repeat (R) regions in the viral genome. It is unclear whether R simply serves as a homologous sequence to mediate the strand transfer or contains specific sequences to promote strand transfer. To test the hypothesis that the molecular mechanism by which R mediates strand transfer is based on homology rather than specific sequences, we examined whether nonviral sequences can be used to facilitate minus-strand DNA transfer. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene was divided into GF and FP fragments, containing the 5' and 3' portions of GFP, respectively, with an overlapping F fragment (85 bp). FP and GF were inserted into the 5' and 3' long terminal repeats, respectively, of a murine leukemia virus-based vector. Utilization of the F fragment to mediate minus-strand DNA transfer should reconstitute GFP during reverse transcription. Flow cytometry analyses demonstrated that GFP was expressed in 73 to 92% of the infected cells, depending on the structure of the viral construct. This indicated that GFP was reconstituted at a high frequency; molecular characterization further confirmed the accurate reconstitution of GFP. These data indicated that nonviral sequences could be used to efficiently mediate minus-strand DNA transfer. Therefore, placement and homology, not specific sequence context, are the important elements in R for minus-strand DNA transfer. In addition, these experiments demonstrate that minus-strand DNA transfer can be used to efficiently reconstitute genes for gene therapy applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheslock et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: