Patients frequently expect and experience complete unconsciousness during regional and monitored anesthesia care, blurring the boundary with general anesthesia from their perspective.
Patients may need clearer preoperative anesthesia depth discussions; cross-sectional data leaves open effects on satisfaction and consent.
In Brief Complaints of “intraoperative awareness” after regional anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care have been reported. We hypothesized that this may be due to either unmet expectations regarding levels of consciousness or states of consciousness resembling general anesthesia. A structured interview assessing expected and experienced levels of consciousness was given to 117 patients who underwent regional anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. Complete unconsciousness was the state most often expected and subjectively experienced. Furthermore, only 58% of patients had expectations set by the anesthesia provider. These data indicate that, from the patient’s perspective, the boundary between general and nongeneral anesthesia is obscured. IMPLICATIONS: In a study of >100 patients, complete loss of consciousness was the single most frequent expectation and subjective experience of patients undergoing regional anesthesia and monitored anesthesia care. These data indicate that, from the patient’s perspective, the boundary between general and nongeneral anesthesia is obscured.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esaki et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: