OBJECTIVE: To assess the analgesic effect of a handheld forced cold air device during fractional photothermolysis. METHODS: Twenty patients who were being treated with full-face fractional photothermolysis were asked to rate their pain level with and without the handheld air-cooling device. Pain was rated on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the worst. RESULTS: Nineteen of 20 patients noted decreased pain with the addition of handheld cooling. The mean level of pain without air-cooling was 6.95 +/- 2.0. The mean level of discomfort with air cooling was 4.0 +/- 1.8. The mean decrease in pain with the addition of air-cooling was 2.9 +/- 1.8. CONCLUSION: The addition of a handheld forced cold air device to cool the skin before and after fractional photothermolysis treatment is an effective adjunctive analgesic modality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fisher et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: