Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The tppz-bridged diruthenium complex [{(L)ClRuII}2(μ-tppz)](ClO4)2, [1](ClO4)2 {tppz = 2,3,5,6-tetrakis(2-pyridyl)pyrazine, L = 2,2′-dipyridylamine} and its mononuclear counterpart [(L)ClRuII(tppz)]ClO4, [2](ClO4) have been synthesized. The 380 mV separation between successive RuII/RuIII couples in [1]2+ leads to a comproportionation constant (Kc) of 2.7 × 106. Consequently, the RuIIRuIII species [1]3+ exhibits a rather narrow intervalence charge transfer band at 1700 nm, suggesting a class III mixed-valence state, the electronic coupling constant (Vab) is calculated at 2940 cm−1. Complex [1]3+ displays a rhombic EPR spectrum at 4 K (g1 = 3.390, g2 = 2.278, g3 = 1.697), characteristic of ruthenium(III) in a distorted octahedral environment. Both complexes show two successive tppz-based reduction processes [(tppz)0/−1 and (tppz)−1/−2]. The one-electron reduced species [1]+ is a tppz radical anion species with an intense low-energy band at 1105 nm and an axial EPR signal at 4 K (g1 = 2.008, g2 = g3 = 1.994). [1]2+ and [2]+ exhibit moderately strong emissions at 740 nm and 668 nm, respectively, in EtOH–MeOH glass at 77 K.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chanda et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: