The adsorption of hydroxy-Al by the 2–0·2 μ size fractions of muscovite, biotite, K-depleted micas, vermiculite and montmorillonite was studied. The differences in the amounts of hydroxy-Al adsorbed were apparently related to the expansibility and layer charge of minerals, the ionic saturation and degree of K-depletion, the basicity (OH/Al ratio) of the equilibrating hydroxy-Al solution, and the solution-clay ratio. The CEC reduction was not necessarily proportional to the amount of Al adsorbed because CEC reduction may occur through occupation of cation exchange sites by hydroxy-Al, or through hindrance to the entry of the replacing cation to these sites. Aluminum interlayering generally increases the K/Ca cation exchange selectivity (CES) of Na-vermiculite and K-depleted biotite, whereas the K/Ca CES of Na-montmorillonite was little affected. The basicity of the initial hydroxy-Al solution appeared to affect the K/Ca CES of Na-vermiculite and K-depleted biotite by controlling the amount of hydroxyl-Al adsorbed. The data indicate that in addition to the “propping effect”, hydroxy-Al interlayers may affect the K/Ca CES through the following mechanisms; (1) the “preferential occupation” of Ca adsorbing sites, and/or (2) the “retarding effect” on the entry of the more hydrated Ca ions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozak et al. (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: