Key result
External quality assessment of FVIII inhibitor testing showed >99% of results correctly identified inhibitor presence or absence, though reported titers varied moderately (CV 25-40%).
Why the study?
To provide updated findings for Factor VIII inhibitor testing in Australasia and the Asia-Pacific region using recent external quality assessment program data.
Observational (n=80)
Yes
Laboratories in the Australasia/Asia-Pacific region demonstrate high accuracy in detecting FVIII inhibitors, though reported titers show moderate variability.
Supports reliable FVIII inhibitor detection in EQA settings; leaves open standardization needs for titer variability in practice.
Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors represent antibodies that develop against coagulation FVIII and reduce FVIII functional activity. FVIII inhibitors may develop in patients with congenital hemophilia A (CHA) in response to infused FVIII (allo-antibodies) or in patients without CHA in a variety of situations (auto-antibodies; acquired hemophilia A). We report updated findings for FVIII inhibitor testing in our geographic region using recent data (testing for the past 5 years; 2020-2024 inclusive) from the RCPAQAP (Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Quality Assurance Program), an international external quality assessment (EQA) program, with over 80 enrolments for the FVIII inhibitor module. Four samples are assessed each year, with these comprising both FVIII inhibitor negative samples and FVIII inhibitor positive samples with various inhibitor titers. This EQA data largely evidences favorable findings in FVIII inhibitor testing in our jurisdiction, with >99% of test results interpreted correctly by participants for the presence ("detected") or absence ("not detected") of FVIII inhibitors in assessed samples. Moreover, most errors in interpretation appear to be transcription or data entry errors rather than analytic errors. The coefficient of variation (CV) values for FVIII inhibitor samples were moderately high, ranging from 25 to 40%, irrespective of the inhibitor titer (range: 3-64 Bethesda units [BU]/mL) or the method (i.e., Bethesda vs. Nijmegen). In conclusion, most laboratories were able to correctly identify the presence versus absence of FVIII inhibitors, although laboratory-reported titers varied moderately.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Favaloro et al. (2025) conducted an observational in FVIII inhibitor testing (n=80). FVIII inhibitor testing was evaluated on Correct interpretation of FVIII inhibitor presence or absence. External quality assessment of FVIII inhibitor testing showed >99% of results correctly identified inhibitor presence or absence, though reported titers varied moderately (CV 25-40%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: