Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nonempirical calculations of the ground−state energy, proton and carbon−13 coupling constants of methyl, ethyl, n−propyl, and cyclopropyl radicals have been performed in the frame of spin−restricted LCAO−SCF open−shell and first−order double−perturbation theories. The rotation barrier is negligible for the ethyl radical. The two barriers of the n−propyl radical are, respectively, 0.3 kcal/mole (0.4 exptl) and 4.7 kcal/mole for the rotations about the Ċ−Cα and Cα−Cβ bonds. The cyclopropyl radical is found to be nonplanar with an out−of−plane angle of 41° and an inversion barrier of 3.80 kcal/mole. For the equilibrium conformations, the computed carbon−13 splittings of the radical carbon of methyl (1), ethyl (2), n−propyl (3), and cyclopropyl (4) are +31.04, +37.90, +37.72, and +138.83 G, respectively; the theoretical α −carbon−13 splittings are −18.14 (2), −17.15 (3), and −8.35 G (4); the β −carbon−13 splitting is +11.8 G for the stable conformation of the n−propyl radical. The calculated coupling constants are negative for α hydrogens, namely −31.03 (1), −33.82 (2), −34.34 (3), and −9.20 G (4); they are found positive for β hydrogens, i.e., +16.8 (2), +23.58 (3), and 12.12 G (4); the γ couplings of the freely rotating hydrogens of the n−propyl radical are negative −0.21 G. The variation of these couplings with conformational and torsional effects has also been investigated. The radical carbon−13 splitting is quite insensitive to rotations of substituents but increases markedly with out−of−plane deviations at the radical site. The coupling constants of α nuclei aHα, aCα are also insensitive to conformational modifications. For β atoms, the contact hyperfine splittings are found to follow the relation aβ=B0+B2 cos2ϑ independently of the chemical nature of the nuclei, B0 being negative if vibronic effects are neglected. Long−range couplings in γ position are generally negative, except in the region depicted by the so−called W−plan arrangement. The role of delocalization and spin polarization is discussed for each kind of coupling. It is shown that intrabond excitations of the CH→CH* type dominate the spin polarization at the proton in all positions, while inner−shell excitations are found to be essential in the case of the radical carbon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellinger et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: