We derive the growth equations for the Wolf-Villain and Das Sarma- Tamborenea models based on the master-equation method. The Wolf-Villain model is shown to obey the conserved growth equation ${{∂}h}{{∂}t}={-}{{ν}}₄{{∇}}⁴h+{{λ}}₂₂{{∇}}²{({∇}h)}²+{Σ}{n=1}^{{∞}}{{λ}}₁₂ₙ₊₁{∇}·{}{({∇}h)}²ⁿ⁺¹+F+{η}$, which is expected to exhibit the scaling behavior of the Edwards-Wilkinson universality class. We find that the Das Sarma- Tamborenea model is governed by the Villain-Lai-Das Sarma equation ${{∂}h}{{∂}t}={-}{{ν}}₄{{∇}}⁴h+{{λ}}₂₂{{∇}}²{({∇}h)}²+F+{η}$ in contrast to former results. The physical origin of the difference between these two similar models is also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: