Key result
Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy did not significantly reduce intestinal epithelial cell damage compared to standard fluid therapy (440.8 vs 522.4 pg/ml, P=0.67) in colorectal surgery.
Why the study?
Does Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy reduce intestinal cell damage or improve gastrointestinal perfusion in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for malignancy?
RCT
randomized
Does Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy reduce intestinal cell damage or improve gastrointestinal perfusion in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for malignancy?
Absolute Event Rate: 440.8% vs 522.4%
p-value: p=0.67
Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy during colorectal surgery improves global gastrointestinal perfusion but does not significantly affect intestinal epithelial cell damage.
No benefit on epithelial damage with Doppler-guided fluids in colorectal surgery; challenges adoption and directs research to clinical endpoints.
Aim Individualized, goal‐directed fluid therapy (GDFT), based on Doppler measurements of stroke volume, has been proposed as a treatment strategy in terms of reducing complications, mortality and length of hospital stay in major bowel surgery. We studied the effect of Doppler‐guided GDFT on intestinal damage as compared with standard postoperative fluid replacement. Method Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for malignancy were randomized either to standard intra‐ and postoperative fluid therapy or to standard fluid therapy with additional Doppler‐guided GDFT. The primary outcome was intestinal epithelial cell damage measured by plasma levels of intestinal fatty acid‐binding protein (I‐FABP). Global gastrointestinal perfusion was measured by gastric tonometry, expressed as regional (gastric) minus arterial CO2‐gap (Pr‐aCO2‐gap). Results I‐FABP levels were not significantly different between the intervention group and the control group (respectively, 440.8 (251.6) pg/ml and 522.4 (759.9) pg/ml, P = 0.67). Mean areas under the curve (AUCs) of intra‐operative Pr‐aCO2‐gaps were significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (P = 0.01), indicating better global gastrointestinal perfusion in the intervention group. Moreover, the mean intra‐operative Pr‐aCO2‐gap peak in the intervention group was 0.5 (1.0) kPa, which was significantly lower than the mean peak in the control group, of 1.4 (1.4) kPa (P = 0.03). Conclusion Doppler‐guided GDFT during and in the first hours after elective colorectal surgery for malignancy increases global gastrointestinal perfusion, as measured by Pr‐aCO2‐gap.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reisinger et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in elective colorectal resection for malignancy. Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) vs. standard intra- and postoperative fluid therapy was evaluated on intestinal epithelial cell damage measured by plasma levels of intestinal fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) (p=0.67). Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy did not significantly reduce intestinal epithelial cell damage compared to standard fluid therapy (440.8 vs 522.4 pg/ml, P=0.67) in colorectal surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: