Key result
Proximal femoral nail significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infection compared to dynamic hip screw (0.0% vs 31.4%, p=0.000) in patients with intertrochanteric fractures.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail devices in the management of intertrochanteric fractures.
Does proximal femoral nail reduce the frequency of infection compared to dynamic hip screw in patients with intertrochanteric fractures?
RCT (n=70)
Chit procedure with sealed envelopes
No
Does proximal femoral nail reduce the frequency of infection compared to dynamic hip screw in patients with intertrochanteric fractures?
In patients with intertrochanteric fractures, the use of a proximal femoral nail significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infection compared to a dynamic hip screw.
PFN was associated with lower infection rates than DHS; hypothesis-generating for implant choice in intertrochanteric fractures.
Objective: To compare the dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail devices in the management of intertrochanteric fractures Design of the Study: It was a cross-sectional survey. Place and Duration of Study: This study was carried at the Department of Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery, Sahara Medical College (Sughra Shafi Medical Complex), Narowal from April 2022 to September 2022. Patients and Methods: In this study, 70 patients of both sexes, ranging in age from 40 to 70, had intertrochanteric fracture surgery. Two treatment groups were created by randomly dividing these patients; Group-A (n=35) patients got proximal femoral nailing while Group-B (n=35) patients underwent fracture fixation with DHS. The outcome variables that were used to compare the two groups were the frequency of infection (diagnosed clinically upon appearance of any two of the following signs within 4 weeks after surgery: redness around the wound, serosangious discharge, and fever >100oF). Every participant's signed informed permission was obtained. Results of the Study: The age of the patients ranged from 40 years to 70 years with a mean of 54.96±8.34 years. There were 28 (40%) male and 42 (60%) female patients. 46 (65.7%) patients had Type-I and 24 (34.3%) patients had Type-II fracture according to Evan’s Classification. The frequency of infection was significantly higher in the DHS group (31.4% vs. 0.0%; p=0.000) as compared to PFN group. Conclusion: In patients with intertrochanteric fractures, proximal femoral nail was found to be superior to DHS in terms of a significantly reduced risk of infection, regardless of the patient's age or gender. This supports the preferred use of proximal femoral nail in future practise, provided the necessary hardware and surgical skills are available.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Intertrochanteric fractures (n=70). Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) vs. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) was evaluated on Frequency of postoperative infection within 4 weeks (p=0.000). Proximal femoral nail significantly reduced the risk of postoperative infection compared to dynamic hip screw (0.0% vs 31.4%, p=0.000) in patients with intertrochanteric fractures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: