This paper presents new results for assessing the robustness of a configuration for multi-purpose machines. The workshop manager is provided with quantitative and meaningful information on how a configuration behaves when disturbances affect the demand. Thus, configurations can be compared on the basis of temporal performance, and also on robustness. The robustness measure of a configuration is returned by assessing the minimum magnitude of disturbances affecting the forecast demand that may lead to breaking the deadline provided by the decision-maker. First, it is shown how to minimise the completion time for a given demand. The demands such that the deadline can be met for a given configuration are then characterised, and two robustness measures for a configuration are also provided. The theoretical results are illustrated in detail using an application example.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
André Rossi (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: