Key result
Fetal primary spongiform cardiomyopathy presented with restrictive pathophysiology, no ventricular enlargement, prominent atria, hydrops, and bradycardia, resulting in death in all 3 perinatal cases.
Case Report (n=3)
Fetal primary spongiform cardiomyopathy is characterized early on by a restrictive pathophysiology with prominent atria and non-dilated ventricles.
Alerts to this rare restrictive phenotype in fetal hydrops evaluation; leaves open larger series for prognosis and genetics.
BACKGROUND: Most cardiomyopathies recognizable in utero are the dilated type-with dilated, poorly contractile left ventricle. We propose a diagnostic criterion for the rare spongiform (noncompacted) cardiomyopathy. CASES: Three perinatal cases with echocardiography and autopsy are presented. The apical ventricular myocardium was thickened and markedly trabeculated. The ventricles were not dilated in two, and the atria were enlarged in all. Hydrops and bradycardia were present in all three despite normal or only mildly diminished contractility. Although the cardiomyopathy was familial in two siblings, two of three cases were female, ruling out Barth syndrome (with sex-linked recessive inheritance). Although all three of our cases with hydrops died, rare survivors have been reported in the eighth decade. CONCLUSION: Although spongiform cardiomyopathy may eventually develop into a dilated cardiomyopathy, its early characteristic is relatively diagnostic: a restrictive cardiomyopathy with no enlargement of the ventricles and prominent atria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Warren G. Guntheroth (2002) conducted a case report in fetal primary spongiform cardiomyopathy (n=3). Spongiform cardiomyopathy was evaluated on Clinical and pathological characteristics. Fetal primary spongiform cardiomyopathy presented with restrictive pathophysiology, no ventricular enlargement, prominent atria, hydrops, and bradycardia, resulting in death in all 3 perinatal cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: