Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The ability of u.v.-A light (320-400 nm) to induce cellular transformation in vitro and to modify chemical carcinogen-induced cellular transformation was investigated in BALB/c 3T3 cell cultures. When administered as a series of nontoxic exposures, u.v.-A alone was found to induce cellular transformation as a linear function of the numbers of u.v-A exposures. Possible interactions of u.v.-A with environmentally encountered chemical carcinogens were studied by examining the effects of u.v.-A light exposures on cellular transformation in cells exposed to the direct acting carcinogen, beta-propiolactone (BPL), an alkylating agent, with a standard initiation/promotion protocol. Twenty-four hours after a single treatment with 2.5 micrograms/ml of beta-propiolactone, cells were exposed to 3.0 kJ/m2 of u.v.-A light. U.v.-A exposures were repeated weekly for up to 5 weeks, after which cells were fixed, stained and dishes were scored for type III transformed foci. Weekly exposures to u.v.-A alone for 5 weeks induced approximately 3 foci/dish. Treatment with BPL alone induced approximately 1 focus/dish (background was 0.17 foci/dish). A combination of the two treatments resulted in a marked increase in the yield of transformed foci/dish, with the u.v.-A enhancement increasing with increasing numbers of exposures (approximately 10 foci/dish after a single exposure to BPL and five u.v.-A exposures). These results suggest a synergistic interaction between BPL and subsequent u.v.-A exposures in the induction of in vitro neoplastic transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baturay et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: