Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The most replete Mulliken-Wolfsberg-Helmholtz (M-W-H) MO calculations available to date2 suffer from a number of deficiencies. Of these, it is probable that the neglect of “atoms-in-molecules” effects is one of the more crucial. In other words, whereas the diagonal matrix elements Hii of the M-W-H energy matrix are readily evaluated from atomic ionization data in such a way as to take account of the charge and configuration of the particular atomic center on which the AO i is situate, they do not include any effects due to the neighboring atomic centers. These effects are probably complex-involving, as they must the full complement of electron repulsion and electron-nuclear penetration effects. A discussion of such effects in heteronuclear MXn molecules has been given in terms of a Madelung potential by Jorgenson et al. 3; these authors have shown that such neighbor effects dominate covalent bonding effects when the atoms M and X have significantly different electronegativies. A more replete discussion of this same topic has been given by Corrington and Cusachs4.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armstrong et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: