This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy has been a major challenge to gastrointestinal endoscopists with low success rates for reaching the target site as well as high complication rates. The knowledge of ERCP-related risk factors is important for reducing unexpected complications. AIM: To identify ERCP-related risk factors for perforation in patients with surgically altered anatomy. METHODS: The medical records of 187 patients with surgically altered anatomy who underwent ERCP at our institution between April 2009 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. An analysis of patient data, including age, sex, type of reconstruction, cause of surgery, aim of ERCP, success rate of reaching target site, success rate of procedure, adverse events, type of scope, time to reach the target site, and duration of procedure, was performed. In patients with Billroth-II reconstruction, additional potential risk factors were the shape of the inserted scope and whether the anastomosis was antecolic or retrocolic. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for perforation during ERCP in patients with surgically altered anatomy were Billroth-II reconstruction and looping of the scope during Billroth-II procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takano et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: