Long-Term Effect of Dust Control on Blood Lead Concentrations

BACKGROUND: Dust control is recommended to prevent children's exposure to residential lead hazards, but the long-term effect of dust control on children's exposure to environmental lead is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of dust control on children's exposure to lead, as measured by blood lead concentration at 48 months of age. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial. Setting. Rochester, New York. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 275 urban children were randomized at 6 months of age; 189 (69%) were available for the 48-month follow-up blood test. Intervention. Children and their families were randomly assigned to an intervention group that received cleaning equipment and up to 8 visits by a trained lead hazard control advisor or to a control group. The intervention was terminated when the children were 24 months of age. OUTCOME MEASURES: Geometric mean blood lead concentration and prevalence of elevated blood lead concentration (ie, >/=10 microg/dL, >/=15 microg/dL, and >/=20 microg/dL), by group assignment. RESULTS: For children with 48-month blood tests, baseline geometric mean blood lead concentrations were 2.8 microg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.6, 3.0); there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or lead exposure by group assignment. At 48 months of age, the geometric mean blood lead was 5.9 microg/dL (95% CI: 5.3, 6.7) for the intervention group and 6.1 microg/dL (95% CI: 5.5,6.9) for the control group. The percentage of children with a 48-month blood lead >/=10 microg/dL, >/=15 microg/dL, and >/=20 microg/dL was 19% versus 19%, 2% versus 9%, and 1% versus 2% in the intervention and control groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that dust control, as performed by families and in the absence of lead hazard controls to reduce ongoing contamination from lead-based paint, was not effective in preventing children's exposure to residential lead hazards.