Key result
Severe secondary mitral regurgitation increased the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to non-severe MR (adjusted HR 1.40), particularly in patients with elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
Why the study?
Limited research has investigated the impact of secondary mitral regurgitation in heart failure patients with different levels of estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
Does severe secondary mitral regurgitation increase the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and varying estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure?
Cohort (n=468)
No
Does severe secondary mitral regurgitation increase the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure and varying estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure?
Hazard Ratio: 1.4 (95% CI 1.03–1.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 54.4% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.030
Severe secondary mitral regurgitation is an independent predictor of cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization in patients with heart failure, particularly those with elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
Severe secondary MR signals higher CV death/HFH risk mainly at ePASP ≥50 mmHg; leaves open whether MR severity refines PH-based risk stratification in HF.
Background: Limited research has been conducted to investigate the impact of secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) in heart failure (HF) patients with different levels of estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (ePASP). Methods: A total of 468 patients suffering from HF and secondary MR were enrolled and categorized into non-severe and severe MR groups based on the degree of MR. The primary endpoint of the study was a composite of cardiovascular death and a first-heart-failure hospitalization. The secondary endpoints were the primary outcomes, individually. The outcomes of the two groups were compared. Patients were further classified based on whether their ePASP was ≥50 mmHg or <50 mmHg. Subsequently, the outcomes of the non-severe and severe MR groups were compared within each ePASP category. Results: In a median (SD) follow-up of 694 (410) days, severe MR was associated with higher risk for primary endpoints in patients with heart failure, especially in those with ePASP ≥50 mmHg. In patients with ePASP <50 mmHg, the prognostic value of severe MR was diminished. Conclusions: Assessment of the severity of MR can identify heart failure patients who are at greater risks for poor clinical outcomes. Additionally, the prognostic value of secondary MR was more pronounced in patients with elevated ePASP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure and secondary mitral regurgitation (n=468). Severe secondary mitral regurgitation vs. Non-severe secondary mitral regurgitation was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death and first heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03-1.91, p=0.030). Severe secondary mitral regurgitation increased the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization compared to non-severe MR (adjusted HR 1.40), particularly in patients with elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: