Key result
Combination therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose cilostazol significantly reduced the rate of clopidogrel resistance to 5.6% compared to 25.4% with clopidogrel alone in patients with ischemic stroke.
Why the study?
Does combination therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose cilostazol improve platelet inhibition and reduce clopidogrel resistance in patients with noncardiogenic ischemic stroke compared to clopidogrel alone?
Cohort (n=231)
No
Does combination therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose cilostazol improve platelet inhibition and reduce clopidogrel resistance in patients with noncardiogenic ischemic stroke compared to clopidogrel alone?
Absolute Event Rate: 5.6% vs 25.4%
p-value: p=<0.05
Adding low-dose cilostazol (100 mg) to clopidogrel significantly reduces clopidogrel resistance and intensifies platelet inhibition in patients with ischemic stroke, potentially offering a strategy to overcome clopidogrel resistance with fewer side effects.
Should not yet change practice in ischemic stroke; leaves open whether cilostazol add-on improves clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: We previously reported that the antiplatelet action is intensified with combined use of clopidogrel and cilostazol in ischemic stroke patients using the VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay. In this study, the relationship between the cilostazol dose and the platelet function achieved with combination therapy was investigated. METHODS: The subjects included 231 patients with noncardiogenic ischemic stroke treated at our hospital (18 patients treated with a combination of clopidogrel (75 mg) and cilostazol (100 mg), 52 patients treated with a combination of clopidogrel (75 mg) and cilostazol (200 mg), 126 patients treated with clopidogrel (75 mg) alone and 35 patients treated with cilostazol (200 mg) alone). The platelet function achieved with 20 μM of adenosine diphosphate was measured using the VerifyNow P2Y12 Assay. Clopidogrel resistance was defined as P2Y12 Reaction Units (PRU) >230 and/or % inhibition <20%. Results The PRU was >230 in 32 patients (25.4%) receiving clopidogrel alone, one patient (5.6%) receiving combination therapy with cilostazol (100 mg) and one patient (1.9%) receiving combination therapy with cilostazol (200 mg). The rate of PRU >230 was significantly lower in both of the cilostazol combination groups than in the clopidogrel alone group. The percent inhibition was <20% in 41 patients (32.5%) receiving clopidogrel alone, one patient (5.6%) receiving a combination with cilostazol (100 mg) and one patient (1.9%) receiving a combination with cilostazol (200 mg). The rate of % inhibition <20% was significantly lower in both of the cilostazol combination groups than in the clopidogrel alone group. CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel resistance was clearly decreased with combination clopidogrel (75 mg) and low-dose (100 mg) cilostazol therapy. The use of combination therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose cilostazol may be one means of overcoming clopidogrel resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maruyama et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Noncardiogenic ischemic stroke (n=231). Clopidogrel (75 mg) and low-dose cilostazol (100 mg) vs. Clopidogrel (75 mg) alone was evaluated on Clopidogrel resistance (defined as P2Y12 Reaction Units >230) (p=<0.05). Combination therapy with clopidogrel and low-dose cilostazol significantly reduced the rate of clopidogrel resistance to 5.6% compared to 25.4% with clopidogrel alone in patients with ischemic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: